University Infrastructure Quality and Students Engagement at a Private University in Uganda

  • Dr Wilson Mugizi Kyambogo University
Keywords: Lecture rooms infrastructure, Equality, Student Engagement, University Level Infrastructure, Utilities


This study assessed the influence of university infrastructure quality on students’ engagement at the western branch of a private University in Bushenyi District, Uganda. Particularly, the study assessed the influence of lecture rooms infrastructure, university-level infrastructure and university utilities. Using the positivist approach, the study was guided by the correlational research design, collecting data using a questionnaire on a sample of 183 students. Descriptive analysis revealed that student engagement was high, lecture rooms’ infrastructure and university utilities were good. However, the students rated university-level infrastructure as fair. Regression analysis showed that lecture rooms’ infrastructure and university utilities were significant positive predictors of students’ engagement. However, university-level infrastructure had a positive but insignificant influence on students’ engagement. Thus, the quality of lecture rooms’ infrastructure is imperative, university utilities are essential and improved university-level infrastructure is a requirement for enhancing students’ engagement. Therefore, it was recommended that universities emphasise providing quality to classroom infrastructure, improve university-level infrastructure, and establish quality university utilities.


Metrics Loading ...


Aydoğan, C., Farran, D. C., & Sağsöz, G. (2015). The relationship between kindergarten classroom environment and children's engagement. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(5), 604-618.

Castro, S., Granlund, M., & Almqvist, L. (2017). The relationship between classroom quality-related variables and engagement levels in Swedish preschool classrooms: a longitudinal study. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 25(1), 122-135.

Chakacha, R. E., Iwu, C. G., & Dakora, E. N. (2014). Determining the relationship between infrastructure and learner success: A comparative study of two primary schools in Zimbabwe. Commonwealth Youth and Development, 12(1), 15-32.

Chikere, C. C., & Nwoka, J. (2015). The systems theory of management in modern day organisations-A study of Aldgate congress resort limited Port Harcourt. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(9), 1-7.

Cuesta, A., Glewwe, P., & Krause, B. (2016). School infrastructure and educational outcomes: a literature review, with special reference to Latin America. Economia, 17(1), 95-130.

Fatou, N., & Kubiszewski, V. (2018). Are perceived school climate dimensions predictive of

students’ engagement? Social Psychology of Education, 21, 427–446. 11218-017-9422-x

Gebre, E., Saroyan, A., & Bracewell, R. (2014).Students' engagement in technology rich classrooms and its relationship to professors' conceptions of effective teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 83-96.

Goodman, A. (2016). The manifestation of student engagement in classrooms: A phenomenological case study of how teachers experience student engagement and how it influences pedagogical decision making. UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 2780. Retrieved from: dissertations/2780

Guardino, C., & Antia, S. D. (2012). Modifying the classroom environment to increase engagement and decrease disruption with students who are deaf or hard of hearing. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 17(4), 518-533. 1093/deafed/ens026

Günüç, S., &Kuzu, A. (2014). Factors influencing student engagement and the role of technology in student engagement in higher education: Campus-Class-Technology Theory. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 5(4), 86-113.

Han, H., Kiatkawsin, K., Kim, W., & Hong, J. H. (2018). Physical classroom environment and student satisfaction with courses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(1), 110-125.

Hansen, E. K., Nielsen, S. M. L., Georgieva, D., & Schledermann, K. M. (2017). The impact of dynamic lighting in classrooms. a review on methods. Interactivity, Game Creation, Design, Learning, and Innovation, 479-489. doi:

Hayat, F. A. (2017). The relationship between access to toilets and school enrollment in Pakistan (Masters Dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C, USA). › handlePDF

Kasozi, A. B. K. (2016). The National Council for Higher Education and the growth of the university sub-sector in Uganda, 2002-2012. CODESRIA.

Kuh, G. D., & Gonyea, R. M. (2015).The role of the academic library in promoting student engagement in learning. C&RL, 76(3), 359-385. 4.256

Lam, S. F., Jimerson, S., Wong, B. P., Kikas, E., Shin, H., Veiga, F. H., ... & Stanculescu, E. (2014). Understanding and measuring student engagement in school: The results of an international study from 12 countries. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(2), 213-232.

Mele, C., Pels, J., & Polese, F. (2010).A brief review of systems theories and their managerial applications. Service Science, 2(1-2), 126-135.

Montenegro, A. (2017). Understanding the concept of student agentic engagement for learning. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 19(1), 117-128. http://dx.doi. org/10. 14483/calj.v19n1.10472

Moore, A. M., & Woods, A. D. (2017). Student engagement: a comparative analysis of traditional and nontraditional students attending historically black colleges and universities. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 6(6), 43-54.

Morrow, B. L., & Kanakri, S. M. (2018). The impact of fluorescent and led lighting on students’ attitudes and behavior in the classroom. Advances in Pediatric Research, 5(15). 2018.5.15

Mujuni, D. (2017, August 30). A close look at Kyambogo’s new fancy buildings. Campus Bee. Available at: › news ›

Ndyabahika, D. (2018, April 24). UGX 7Bn required to equip new Makerere University buildings. Available at:

Nepal, B., & Maharjan, R. (2015). Effect of school's physical facilities on learning and outcomes of students in Nepal. Journal for Studies in Management and Planning, 1(6), 266-279.

Nguyen, T. D., Cannata, M., & Miller, J. (2018). Understanding student behavioral engagement: Importance of student interaction with peers and teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(2), 163-174.

Nordstrum, L. E. (2015). Effective teaching and education policy in Sub-Saharan Africa: A conceptual study of effective teaching and review of educational policies in 11 Sub-Saharan African Countries. Washington, DC: RTI International.

Oliveras Ortiz, Y., Bouillion, E. D., & Asbury, L. (2017). The impact of learning environments on student engagement. Educational Leadership and Policy Studies Faculty Publications and Presentations. Paper 25

Oliveras-Ortiz, Y., Bouillion, D. E., & Asbury, L. (2019). Listening to high school students: purposefully designed spaces and the impact on students’ engagement in learning. presentation paper 27.

Parsons, J., & Taylor, L. (2011). Improving student engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14, 1-32.

Pouvreau, D., & Drack, M. (2007). On the history of Ludwig von Bertalanffy's “General Systemology”, and on its relationship to cybernetics: Part I: elements on the origins and genesis of Ludwig von Bertalanffy's “General Systemology”. International Journal of General Systems, 36(3), 281-337.

Schmidt, J. A., Rosenberg, J. M., & Beymer, P. N. (2018). A person‐in‐context approach to student engagement in science: Examining learning activities and choice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(1), 19-43.

Smallhorn, M., Young, J., Hunter, N., & da Silva, K. B. (2015). Inquiry-based learning to improve student engagement in a large first-year topic. Student Success, 6(2), 65-71. v 6i2.292

Souza, A. C. D., Alexandre, N. M. C., & Guirardello, E. D. B. (2017). Psychometric Properties in Instruments Evaluation of Reliability and Validity. Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude, 26, 649-659.

Tor, H., & Jorun, N. [Eds.] (2017). North-South knowledge networks towards equitable collaboration between: Academics, donors and universities. Cape Town, South Africa: African Minds

Trochim, W. M., Cabrera, D. A., Milstein, B., Gallagher, R. S., & Leischow, S. J. (2006).Practical challenges of systems thinking and modelling in public health. American Journal of Public Health, 96(3), 538-546.

Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The Higher Education Academy, 11(1), 1-15

Virtanen, T. E., Lerkkanen, M. K., Poikkeus, A. M., & Kuorelahti, M. (2015). The relationship between classroom quality and students’ engagement in secondary school. Educational Psychology, 35(8), 963-983. 2013.822961

Wadhwa, D. (2016). Does access to sanitation and drinking water facilities relate to students' learning outcomes? Evidence from Andhra Pradesh, India (Masters Dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C, USA). › sites › files › Wa...PDF

Wang, M. T., & Hofkens, T. L. (2020). Beyond classroom academics: A school-wide and multi-contextual perspective on student engagement in school. Adolescent Research Review, 5(4), 419-433.

Yang, G., Badri, M., Al Rashedi, A., Almazroui, K., Qalyoubi, R., & Nai, P. (2017). The effects of classroom and school environments on student engagement: The case of high school students in Abu Dhabi public schools. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47(2), 223-239. 925.2016.1230833

Yonezawa, S., Jones, M., & Joselowsky, F. (2009). Youth engagement in high schools: Developing a multi-dimensional, critical approach to improving engagement for all students. Journal of Educational Change, 10(2-3), 191-209.

How to Cite
Mugizi, W. (2021). University Infrastructure Quality and Students Engagement at a Private University in Uganda . Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research , 3(2), 98-107.